It feels like scala doesn't really have types when all types implicitly coerce to everything else. I thought we only allowed this behaviour in silly languages like JavaScript and R?
@edensaesthetic yea, it could be a great language...if it wasn't for the jvm. Seems like a lot of it's downsides come from wanting to be java-compatible :-/
@edensaesthetic yea, it could be a great language...if it wasn't for the jvm. Seems like a lot of it's downsides come from wanting to be java-compatible :-/