when people say "end capitalism", what do they mean?

if capitalism is just "accumulation of capital", it seems like there's a fundamental piece of human nature / greed that you can't just eliminate by decree. even if you start from a blank slate you'll end up w/ imbalance similar to today eventually

asked another way, how do you use law or regulation to construct a society where greed doesn't create capitalism- or feudalism-like conditions?

ill amend this since i got a few replies in the same vein.

looking at the perspective of an _existing_ society with capital-oriented assumptions, greed exists as a function of people optimizing for money or power or whatever and i dont think you're going to reeducate everyone out of that in a single generation.

so... how can you create a non capital oriented society from that? with actors in it whose actions are capital oriented?

i got a lot of different answers that i think speak to a range of political viewpoints and that was really interesting to read, thanks

it seems like there are varying definitions of capital/capitalism and that as a result there are widely varying definitions of what it means to end it, if that's even actually the end goal or just a means or side effect of another goal

it sounds like some folks are working towards creating "external" systems which set up non-capital-oriented structures, which sounds pretty cool but i have questions about how that scales to a whole society

others pointed out past successes of revolutions or collective action; sounds like there are at least a few examples of successes that didn't involve massive loss of life, which is good.