on a more serious note, i just discovered the Artistic License 2.0 and i dig it
@typhlosion the relicensing clause is a can of worms
@vi what makes you say that? it seems clear enough to me at least in the 2.0 version
@typhlosion code is effectively under a bunch of different licenses, some of which don't even exist yet so who knows what they'll say, let's hope GPLv57 is good
plus a fork can relicense and the original can't get changes back
@vi that's an excellent point - but if you don't care about getting the changes back, or otherwise don't mind what terms a license has as long as it's compliant with what AL says, then i don't see a problem
and if you're forking some AL2 code and don't want to release it under AL2... you can just... relicense it
@typhlosion it also means the AL2 doesn't really get you anything over just using another license. Forks have to rename, list their changes and not conflict with installation of the original, etc., but they can just relicense and now they don't