In retrospect, one of my worst mistakes in college was dropping an elective on nonlinear dynamics halfway through. Knowing the subject as I do now, I suspect it would have improved (and been useful to me!). Also, if I'd had that math elective on my scorecard, I wouldn't have tried to fill that requirement the following year with real analysis, which was more of a slog *and* a bad course to take in a term which was heavily overloaded anyway.
First term of my junior year was my worst. I took real analysis, Quantum II and the physics lab course, any one of which could easily expand to fill the available time. The predictable result: I did a mediocre job in all of them.
@bstacey "Weed out" classes are utter bullshit.
@And_Zoidberg @tobascodagama Yes, to some extent: I think hazing is partly about forming social bonds in a fucked-up way, which wasn't really a thing that the physics department had in mind. This wasn't quite a fraternity ritual; it was more like "teaching" a kid to swim by dropping them into the deep end of a pool.
@tobascodagama @And_Zoidberg Our "instruction" in fitting curves to data was pretty much, "Here's a MATLAB script, have at it!" Into the deep end, sploosh!
@And_Zoidberg @tobascodagama ... Which was irresponsible in multiple ways, from instilling a dependence on hyper-proprietary closed-source software, to perpetuating the idea that linear regression solves all curve-fitting problems.
@tobascodagama @bstacey Correct. An educator's job is to help ALL their students learn, not to cast some into the outer darkness.
@tobascodagama @bstacey Sounds pretty much like an academic version of hazing, with all the problems it entails