Trust: hard won, easily lost utilise witches.town. Vous pouvez læ suivre et interagir si vous possédez un compte quelque part dans le "fediverse".
Trust: hard won, easily lost @nire

hey so apparently CWs act as if it was a .@, everyone in your feed sees it even if it was directly @ someone, as if you were to do .@ blah blah

expected behavior is for it to only be seen by ppl who follow both you and the other party

@nire @ mentions do not imply anything except for notification for other people. You need to adjust the reach of your toot yourself, that's how I understand it.

I treat most of the replies as perfectly valid public timeline toots, so that's good for me, but that's not what a casual birdsite migrant may expect.

@nire I just tested this and the CW'd posts didn't show up for the third person who wasn't following the person I replied to

@nire @chr This is a pretty weird behavior, especially since CW usually covers sensitive subjects which one often doesn't want to be "publicized" (as in .@)

@hisham_hm @nire @chr that is correct. Content Warning covers sensitive info unless clicked on, but Mastodon uses .@ as a targeted broadcast to an individual or group but the entire content is publicly viewable if searched for. There is, to my knowledge, no private communication channels for any Mastodon instance. This is somewhat concerning, depending on the expectations of the users.

@Jirikiha @nire @chr It's not so much a matter of what's private, but what is "broadcasted" to (ie, brought to the attention of) followers.

@hisham_hm @nire @chr anything I say to you goes to your notifications, and also ends up in all of my followers' Home feed. It's... somewhat odd, yes.

@Jirikiha @hisham_hm you are, I believe, intentionally missing my point, because the fact that CW does the same as .@ when there are people @'d is clearly unintended behavior, or it would not behave differently than an @.

its counting the CW characters as prefixing the first @

@nire @hisham_hm not intentionally. Some days I'm just dense. Apologies for the misunderstanding.