**beatrix bitrot** @bea@glitch.social · 05 déc. 2017, 17:27

**beatrix bitrot** @bea@glitch.social · 05 déc. 2017, 17:27

how bad would it be to have a 'thing' table?

**Erin 🕯** @er1n@social.mecanis.me · 05 déc. 2017, 17:27

**Erin 🕯** @er1n@social.mecanis.me · 05 déc. 2017, 17:27

@bea SELECT FROM things WHERE something=stuff

**beatrix bitrot** @bea@glitch.social · 05 déc. 2017, 17:28

**beatrix bitrot** @bea@glitch.social · 05 déc. 2017, 17:28

@er1n i mean

yeah

**kendall** @morae · 05 déc. 2017, 18:27

**kendall** @morae · 05 déc. 2017, 18:27

@bea @er1n isn't this just nosql

**beatrix bitrot** @bea@glitch.social · 05 déc. 2017, 19:29

**beatrix bitrot** @bea@glitch.social · 05 déc. 2017, 19:29

@morae @er1n no because i actually still need to be able to make structured queries on the table and relating it to others and such

**kendall** @morae · 2017-12-05T19:31:32Z

kendall @morae

@bea @er1n ah yes ok that's :oh_no: -sql

**beatrix bitrot** @bea@glitch.social · 05 déc. 2017, 19:31

**beatrix bitrot** @bea@glitch.social · 05 déc. 2017, 19:31

@morae @er1n with bonus recursive queries~~~