has anyone made a bot/neural net trained on the names of every town and city in america that generates fake town names
i'm curious if a neural net trained on town names would generate like, convincing names or just weird garbage like that neural net someone made to generate paint colors
i found a text file of over 20,000 US town and city names so i know what i'm doing now
@lycaon ULTIMATE ROAD TRIP
@HTHR jesus christ. imagine trying to visit literally every town and city in america.
now i'm going to get distracted trying to calculate the fastest route to do that + how long it would take.
@HTHR The Ultimate Traveling Salesman Problem
@lycaon holy shit i was just about to send you that
anyways, uh, that's O(20000!), or as DuckDuckGo puts it, https://cybre.space/media/rE9VEUHsEDuyVwCrmV4
@HTHR oh come on duckduckgo, you and i both know very well that even 20000! is much, much smaller than infinity
@HTHR you can't just say big numbers are infinity, that's the coward's way out
@HTHR tell that to ron graham, duckduckgo
@lycaon i'm tipsy and this is my stance on math
@HTHR wolframalpha isn't a coward
@lycaon TIMES TEN TO THE SEVENTY SEVEN THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED THIRTY SEVEN
@HTHR and that's not even all the digits. i can't even get it to show me all the digits.
@lycaon we need a new wolfram alpha, with only one parameter: don't be a fucking coward about big numbers
@HTHR its power of 10 representation is 10^77337.25988195615
@lycaon fucked up if true
@HTHR man.......... there are too many numbers
@lycaon there should only be, like... eight true numbers, and everything after thati s a Bastard Number
@lycaon IS IT COMPARING THE AMOUNTO F A NUMBER COMPARED TO THE VALUE OF A HUMAN LIFE
@HTHR no it's the number of people named graham it estimates are alive right now
@HTHR it didn't even GIVE me the truth value for the inequality
@lycaon the result is that a bigass number is less important than the collective total of everyone named graham
@lycaon one of those fuckers made the cookie and we must respect him for that
@HTHR well I wanted to know if 20000! was less than graham's number
i think it is
@lycaon it proooobably is?
@lycaon it sounds like it should be
@HTHR it is, it's less than skewes' number (10^10^10^34), which was the record holder for biggest number used in a proof before graham's number
@lycaon FUCk what was that one for????
@HTHR it's the smallest natural number x for which π (x) > li(x)
(π in this context is the prime-counting function, you give it a number and it tells you how many primes there are less than it)
@HTHR there's a numberphile video on it If You Are Interested https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lihh_lMmcDw
@lycaon oh dunk!!!! i will check it out in the morning
@lycaon ron graham is a bastard and his number is a fucker