@Melezh @Antanicus @jd of course not, but you can try to figure out what you want at the end of the transition, ideally.
I mean, democracy has this whole thing going with rule of law, human rights, checks and balances, etc. Even if it's not perfectly defined nor perfectly implemented, I can understand the machinery, and how it is supposed to work. And then I can try fixing it.
I don't have this understanding in Anarchism.
@rysiek
That is potentially because there are a lot of possibilities for running an anarchist society. Some of the main tendencies are :
* democratic confederalism (also named communalism and municipalism) -> the system wanted by the Paris' commune, cf Murray Bookchin and Öcalan, that is what the syrian Kurds are trying to build in Rojava ;
* anarcho-syndicalism -> used during the Spanish civil war in 36 by the CNT/FAI
In both ways, think that anrchism is the Mastodon of politics : decentralized gestion.
@Melezh @Antanicus @jd