my initial problem w/ foucault is the same as my problem w/ any system of splintering 'meaning', incidentally, which is that the point isn't to accurately describe the workings of power, the point is to smash the state.
or, more precisely and less accurately, if the always local and contingent networks of power do tend to enunciate themselves as certain binary oppositions of power-subjection/subjugation, maybe let's do something about the subjugation first off
or, more precisely and less accurately, if the always local and contingent networks of power do tend to enunciate themselves as certain binary oppositions of power-subjection/subjugation, maybe let's do something about the subjugation first off