@CursedConfetti Or else cultural connotations emerge around vowel choice - like a person can speak formally or seductively or affrontively just by what sound they choose, and that tone *might* be conveyable over text.

@weird_hell

Mm so with that seed I'd say
<p t β k ʁ H X N S Z >
With a labialized pair, palatalized pair, and voiced pair w/
H being (h~ç~ʔ) in free variation
X (χ~ʝ~q)
N (ɲ~n~ɴ)
S (s~ʃ~ɕ)
Z (z~ʒ~ʑ)

Let the vowels just be (a e i o u), say they are roughly equivalent to Spanish vowels but this is a protolang no reason to be caught on details
[N|H] (C) [ʷ|ʲ|:][H|X|F] (V)[:][N|H] (C) [ʷ|:|ʲ]
F for fricative

If onset is heavy, or vowel lengthened the coda can't be heavy

@weird_hell

So at this point this protolang is a project between you and me, anyones free to chime in input

A 2nd protolang in the future would be really neat to form a substrate/superstrate

I'm thinking the 1st should be agglunative/fusional/inflectional type grammar structure.

Split ergativity nom-acc ? (Like ergative in a certain aspect /tense)

I have a bias for liking SOV, VSO langs myself

@CursedConfetti VSO is my JAM. However, call me tomorrow so I can actually wiki the terms I've forgotten. Tonight's a little bit lacking in academic ability... As you might be able to surmrise.